US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth texted the start time for a planned killing of a Houthi fighter in Yemen on March 15 as well as other details of imminent waves of US air strikes, according to a screenshot of a text chat released by The Atlantic on Wednesday.
Hegseth has repeatedly denied texting war plans as President Donald Trump's administration tries to contain the fallout from the revelation that it included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg in a group chat on the encrypted messaging app Signal with Trump's most senior national security advisers to coordinate on the start of an offensive in Yemen.
Trump's administration said on Tuesday that no classified information was shared in the chat, bewildering Democrats and former US officials, who regard targeting information as some of the most closely held material ahead of a US military campaign.
Goldberg, who had initially declined to publish the chat details, did so on Wednesday.
Hegseth's text started with the title "TEAM UPDATE" and included these details, according to The Atlantic:
“TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch"
“1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”
“1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”
“1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)”
“1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)”
“1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.”
“MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)”
“We are currently clean on OPSEC”
“Godspeed to our Warriors.”
Senior US national security officials have classified systems that are meant to be used to communicate secret materials.
'Oversold' US attack plan story
US Vice President JD Vance dismissed the magazine story on the Trump administration inadvertently sending plans for an imminent attack on Yemen to a journalist as "oversold," after the publication released the transcript.
"It's very clear (Jeffrey) Goldberg oversold what he had," Vance posted on X, referring to the Atlantic editor-in-chief who was mistakenly included in the group chat of top Trump officials discussing military plans.
"No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS," posted National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, who has admitted being responsible for Goldberg being added to the group on the commercial chat app Signal.
Not classified
CIA Director John Ratcliffe testified on Tuesday at a Senate hearing that national security adviser Mike Waltz set up the Signal chat for unclassified coordination and that teams would be "provided with information further on the high side for high-side communication."
Waltz, in an interview with "The Ingraham Angle" on Fox News on Tuesday, said: "I take full responsibility" for the breach, as he had created the Signal group.
Waltz also played down the disclosure, saying on X: "No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS. Foreign partners had already been notified that strikes were imminent."
At the Senate hearing, Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Hegseth would be the one to determine what defence information was classified.
"The Secretary of Defense is the original classification authority for DOD in deciding what would be classified information," Ratcliffe said.
Asked if details about the strikes on the Houthis, like attack sequencing and timing, would not have been considered classified, Gabbard testified: "I defer to the secretary of defence and the National Security Council on that question."
Hegseth did not answer a question on Tuesday evening about whether he declassified the information discussed in the Signal chat, saying only: "Nobody's texting war plans and that is all I have to say about that." He expressed pride in the strikes.
"The strikes against the Houthis that night were devastatingly effective. And I'm incredibly proud of the courage and skill of the troops. And they are ongoing and continue to be devastatingly affected," Hegseth said.
The US military has declined to offer basic details about the offensive in Yemen, including how many strikes have been carried out, what senior leaders have been targeted or killed and even whether the operation has a name.
